Chevron, one of the world’s biggest oil companies, is stepping outside its traditional energy lane—and it’s aiming directly at the red-hot world of data centers. Earlier this week, the company revealed plans to build power plants to feed electricity-hungry data centers in West Texas, starting deployments in 2027 and targeting multiple gigawatts of capacity by 2030. Chevron is partnering with GE Vernova and activist-turned-investor Engine No. 1, and it’s already in exclusive talks with an unnamed data center company for a final investment decision early next year. That’s not small potatoes—this could be a major strategic pivot for a company still best known for drilling and refining oil.
The move raises a big question: is this a side hustle or a serious growth vector? Chevron insists it’s about enhancing cash flows, not replacing barrels with kilowatt-hours. So far, it’s framed as a high-return extension of its current capabilities, not a radical reinvention. And that tracks with the rest of Chevron’s strategy: keep capital discipline tight, reward shareholders through buybacks and dividends, and make selective bets where it sees an edge.
Data Centers & Gas: A Match Made In West Texas
Let’s be honest—data centers are booming like it’s 1999, but this time the growth is real and tied to an insatiable need for power, especially in AI-heavy workloads. West Texas, already a gas-rich hub with infrastructure in place, is a natural fit. Chevron’s pitch is simple: use its natural gas expertise to supply electricity through on-site generation, directly powering data centers with cleaner-burning fossil fuels. In a world where digital infrastructure is scaling faster than the grid can handle, this isn’t just opportunistic—it’s addressing a real bottleneck.
By building these plants near data centers, Chevron gets around transmission issues and creates a steady source of demand. With multiple gigawatts in the pipeline, this isn’t just a pilot project. If successful, it could offer Chevron something rare in its portfolio: a way to monetize gas outside of LNG exports or volatile spot pricing. And because the company is working with GE Vernova, which has deep experience in industrial power systems, and Engine No. 1, a fund with activist roots and ESG bona fides, the project has some reputational upside, too.
The key here is that Chevron isn’t chasing subsidies or unproven technologies. It’s using natural gas, leveraging infrastructure it already understands, and selling into a secular growth market. That’s not a climate play per se—but it is a diversification move with commercial logic behind it.
Strong Balance Sheet & Capital Discipline Give It Room To Experiment
Chevron isn’t making this play from a position of weakness. As of mid-2025, the company’s net debt to capital stood at 15%, among the lowest in its peer group. That’s before including the Hess acquisition, which is still being integrated but expected to be accretive over time. Even in a $50-per-barrel oil world, Chevron says it can maintain its dividend, capital budget, and buybacks without blinking.
What’s more, Chevron expects to spend $18–$21 billion in annual capex through 2030—modestly below current levels once Hess is fully digested. That leaves some room for non-core investments like this power venture, without compromising core oil and gas projects. With a $10 billion–$20 billion annual buyback program underway (contingent on oil prices staying between $60 and $80), the company is clearly prioritizing returns to shareholders over empire-building.
This new initiative fits snugly within that framework. The power business is not replacing upstream but supplementing it with low-risk, cash-generative infrastructure. Chevron’s broader strategy has been about finding margin-accretive projects that also enhance capital efficiency. If these plants can deliver double-digit returns—as the company believes—they could quietly boost the company’s free cash flow without drawing too much capital away from the core business.
Execution & Scale Are Real Hurdles, Even For Chevron
Of course, building a power business isn’t as simple as flipping a switch. Chevron’s move into data center energy represents a new domain, one where it’s still a minor player. The company has historically stayed close to its hydrocarbons knitting—even its low-carbon investments have focused on things like hydrogen, carbon capture, and renewable fuels. Electricity generation is new territory.
There’s also the question of execution. The power plants are expected to begin deployments in 2027, but that timeline depends on permitting, infrastructure buildout, and a final investment decision that hasn’t yet been made. Chevron’s partners bring expertise, but the company still has to navigate a complex regulatory and operational landscape, especially if it wants to scale to “multiple gigawatts” by 2030. It’s not a trivial build, even for a company of Chevron’s size.
On top of that, competition is heating up. Utilities, startups, and even cloud providers themselves are exploring dedicated energy sources for data centers. That could compress margins or crowd out Chevron’s efforts if it can’t move fast enough or differentiate on cost and reliability. While the company does have scale and credibility in energy, this is still a new game with new rules.
Competitive Landscape Is Shifting Underfoot
Chevron isn’t the only energy major sniffing around the data center space. Shell, BP, and others are exploring power strategies to feed data and compute demands. But Chevron’s angle—on-site power generation using natural gas—plays to its core strengths, especially in a region where it already has a strong upstream presence. That might offer a defensible niche.
Still, the market won’t stay quiet forever. As more companies race to provide power to hyperscale cloud and AI data centers, the risk is that electricity supply becomes commoditized—or worse, disrupted by new technology like long-duration batteries or advanced nuclear. That’s unlikely before 2030, but it’s not inconceivable over a longer horizon. And Chevron, by its own admission, isn’t investing heavily in pure renewables or grid-scale innovation.
On the flip side, the West Texas data center play could give Chevron something its rivals lack: direct, baseload-linked power demand that can smooth cash flow across commodity cycles. If Chevron can lock in long-term contracts with data center operators, it might secure a steady, low-volatility earnings stream in a volatile business. But those contracts haven’t been signed yet—and data center operators are notoriously price-sensitive.
Final Thoughts: A Smart Pivot, But Not A Game Changer—Yet
Chevron’s data center power strategy is a well-timed pivot into a high-demand market that plays to its gas infrastructure and capital strengths. The company’s balance sheet, capital discipline, and operating scale make it well-positioned to test the waters here without risking its core oil and gas operations. And with data centers scrambling for power in places like West Texas, the commercial rationale is strong.
But it’s still early days. Execution risks, regulatory complexity, and rising competition all loom large. Chevron’s power plant vision could quietly become a cash cow—or it could stall in permitting limbo or get outcompeted by more nimble players. And while the company pitches this as a double-digit return opportunity, those returns haven’t been realized yet.
From a valuation standpoint, Chevron trades at 9.36x LTM EV/EBITDA and 21.94x LTM P/E, both on the higher end compared to its historical range. That suggests the market is already pricing in a healthy dose of optimism, possibly linked to the Hess integration, strong free cash flow, and capital returns. The data center power plan might add incremental upside—but it doesn’t fundamentally shift the investment thesis yet.
For now, this is a story to watch, not chase. But in a world where every AI boom needs a power plug, Chevron just might have found a new outlet.
Disclaimer: We do not hold any positions in the above stock(s). Read our full disclaimer here.
